pexels-kulbir-11079217
pexels-kulbir-11079217
pexels-kulbir-11079217
This is basically an opinion response paper to a section of a reading. This shou
Home » Political Science  »  This is basically an opinion response paper to a section of a reading. This shou
This is basically an opinion response paper to a section of a reading. This shou
This is basically an opinion response paper to a section of a reading. This should catalogue your immediate reactions to the text’s argument, perhaps reactions such as What is the setting of this text? This involves asking: Who wrote this text? When were they alive, in what circumstances? What might have been important or meaningful to them? Were there any significant political movements or events to which they may have been responding? What kinds of commitments would have shaped their opinions thereof? Were there any restrictions on what was allowed to be published at the time? as well as : What understanding(s) of the word “politics” are present in this text? This might involve asking: Where does politics take place? In what kinds of spaces, institutions, or communities? What activities does politics involve? Does politics have an objective? If so, what is it? Who does politics? What sorts of groups or categories does the text describe? What relationship do they have to one another? What is the text trying to accomplish? This might involve looking at the setting and method (see reading guide). What parts of the text excite, repulse, or confuse you? What is one question you would bring to class from the text? THIS IS IN FORM OF AN ESSAY do not use bullet points, use your own opinion in form of an essay. You can use these readings as citations but not so many outside sources. the readings are: Weber, Max—The Vocation Lectures (32-35, 74-94) Luxemburg, Rosa—“Order Prevails in Berlin”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Scan the code