pexels-kulbir-11079217
pexels-kulbir-11079217
pexels-kulbir-11079217
Supporting ideas are not relevant, and/or paragraphs need to be unified with substantial information.
Home » Anatomy  »  Supporting ideas are not relevant, and/or paragraphs need to be unified with substantial information.
Supporting ideas are not relevant, and/or paragraphs need to be unified with substantial information.
M3. Writing Assignment: The Skin Improvement Myth Due Tuesday by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a file upload Available Sep 21 at 12am - Sep 27 at 11:59pm Debunking the Skin Improvement Myth - Product review Locate an ad for a skin improvement product that attempts to use evidence-based data to promote its effectiveness. For example, an ad might say something like this: "with natural botanical enzymes that exfoliate your skin". Analyze the ad's claims and categorize these claims as accurate or inaccurate and explain why using information from the course (textbook) and outside reputable sources. Your focus should be on using evidence about the structure and function of the parts of the integumentary system that your chosen product claims to improve. Minimum length of 500 words Any quoted or paraphrased material must follow APA guidelines for inline citations and Works Cited. Refer to these OCC pages for tips: Student Services - Plagiarism (Links to an external site.)or Student Services - APA (Links to an external site.). Include a minimum of one outside reputable source in addition to your course text Writing Assignment Rubric 2021 (100 points) 2 Writing Assignment Rubric 2021 (100 points) 2 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Coverage (15pts) 30 pts Full Marks Purposefully addresses all portions of the topic. Major supporting ideas are thoughtful, readily identifiable and well-developed. 16 pts Average Partially addresses portions of the topic. Supporting ideas are not relevant, and/or paragraphs need to be unified with substantial information. 0 pts No Marks The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components outlined in the topic. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Content (15pts) 30 pts Full Marks Appropriate course content is used as evidence to adequately support the topic. 16 pts Average Some course content is used but may not adequately support the topic. 0 pts No Marks No course content is used or content does not support the topic. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Sources (10pts) 20 pts Full Marks Uses the required appropriate reputable sources as evidence to adequately support the topic. 10 pts Average Some of the required sources are used but may not adequately support the topic. 0 pts No Marks No required sources are used or sources do not support topic. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation Formatting (5pts) 10 pts Full Marks All information from sources is cited appropriately (APA) using parenthetical citations and a Reference (Works Cited) section. 6 pts Average An attempt at citing sources is made, but formatting may be incorrect. 0 pts No Marks Sources are not cited. If plagiarism has occurred, it will be reported per policy #5180. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Word Count (5pts) 10 pts Full Marks Required word count is met and paper is free of distracting spelling and grammatical errors. 6 pts Average Word count is not met and/or spelling and grammar have a few errors. 0 pts No Marks Word count is not met and spelling and grammar errors detract from readability of assignment. 10 pts Total Points: 100

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Scan the code