PART ONE- Minumum 500 By applying Build-Borrow-Buy framework in Chapter 9, answer the questions below: For Disney: What is the target resource Disney needs? Can Disney develop the target resource internally? Can Disney borrow the target resource through the market mechanisms? Should Disney work closely to Pixar? Can Disney integrate Pixar easily? Repeat the same analyses for Pixar. What is the target resource Pixar needs? Can Pixar develop the target resource internally? Can Pixar borrow the target resource through the market mechanisms? Should Pixar work closely to Disney? Can Pixar integrate Disney easily? In the end, do you think they have to merge each other? Minimum number of words: 500 PART ONE PART TWO- Minimum number of words: 150 Reference Image Attached What is the wrong explanation on Disney-Pixar case based on Build-Borrow-or-Buy Framework below? (a) Internal (organic) building is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because internal resources are not highly relevant to the targeted resources (i.e., low relevancy). (b) Contractual alliance is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the targeted resources are not highly tradable on the market (i.e., low tradability). The current difficulties in renewing their contract in the case illustrates this point. (c) Alliance with equity is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the Pixar and Disney compete directly in production stage currently and will compete directly in marketing and distribution stages in the near future if alliance with equity works well (i.e., high closeness). (d) Acquisition is a natural decision based on the framework due to low relevancy, low tradability, high closeness, and easy integration.